Should you go to Zimbabwe?

02/09/2016 21:18

Written by Paul Murray

It’s safe to say that tourism in Zimbabwe, at the time of writing, is a shadow of its former self – with the exception of Victoria Falls, Hwange National Park and the Middle Zambezi area. People were either frightened to visit, believing it to be dangerous or they, particularly Britons and South Africans, were voting with their feet and deciding not to support the current regime by boycotting the country. Below I have tried to answer potential travellers’ two most pertinent questions. They are very much my own views but they’re born out of many years living in Zimbabwe and countless miles of driving all around the country through good times and bad.

Is it safe?

Emphatically, ‘Yes’. It’s generally recognised by experienced travellers that ordinary Zimbabweans are probably the most friendly and welcoming citizens of all the countries in the region. They used to enjoy and value having us in their country; then we stopped visiting and now they desperately want us back. My wife and I have driven the length and breadth of the country several times over, most of the time on our own, for the last 20 years, including during the build-up to the last two elections. (You can perhaps imagine the driving distances involved in researching three editions of this book.) During all those miles we have not encountered even a hint of trouble. We adopted nothing more than the standard, sensible and obvious safety measures recommended for independent travel anywhere in the world. Far from feeling intimidated or nervous, I have been met everywhere by incredibly friendly, welcoming and helpful people. That includes the authorities and the police. Police roadblocks are an all-too-common phenomenon and seem to strike fear and apprehension into the hearts of many independent travellers. Don’t worry, though. If you approach the road checks in a relaxed manner, these encounters frequently involve a few laughs and jokes and invariably end with your being wished a safe journey. They can certainly be a frustrating inconvenience but in my lengthy experience, never worse than that.

Victoria Falls Zimbabwe by Sarah Kerr Wild HorizonsVictoria Falls – Zimbabwe's poster child © Sarah Kerr, Wild Horizons 

Despite the above, it would be naive not to recognise that crime has increased as a result of the economic implosion and its legacy of unemployment, but I still regard Zimbabwe as one of the safest countries I’ve ever visited (I travelled extensively as an airline employee) and certainly many times more secure than next-doorneighbour South Africa and, dare I say it, the UK. Any violence you read about is invariably and exclusively politically motivated and does not involve tourists or tourism areas. So please think about this: generally speaking the worldwide media rushes to places where there’s a bad news story. In Zimbabwe this tends to be during the weeks prior to elections and of course the country always manages to deliver newsworthy material. But the moment the results are declared the journalists all dash off to the next trouble spot and Zimbabwe returns to normal and disappears from the headlines. Sadly though, as said before, mud sticks.

Far from feeling intimidated or nervous, I have been met everywhere by incredibly friendly, welcoming and helpful people.

Finally, as a personal example of our faith in the safety of this country, my stepson got married several years ago (in the ‘bad old days’ of 2007) and we encouraged the couple to spend their honeymoon in Zimbabwe. If my wife had thought there was even a whiff of danger she wouldn’t have let her son and new daughter-in-law within 1,000 miles of the country. As predicted, they had a great time and the only harassment they received was from mosquitoes.

Is it moral?

At the time of writing, Robert Mugabe (aged 92) is in his 29th year of presidency. Add to that his years as Prime Minister and he’s been in charge of the country for 36 years. Sadly, the post-independence era (since 1980) has been dogged by continual reports of human rights abuses including an instance of what is now being called genocide. The government has been charged by the international community with rigging elections and using violence against political opponents and their supporters. The so-called ‘land reform’ programme (farm invasions) created mass casualties in all walks of life and these have been well documented.

Following the economic collapse, probably four million people, nearly a third of Zimbabwe’s population, left the country as either economic or political refugees. A large proportion of those who stayed faced potentially fatal conditions such as malnutrition, AIDS, TB, malaria and other illnesses, made all the more risky due to an almost complete lack of publicly accessible medical products and facilities. It’s estimated that the life expectancy of the average Zimbabwean dropped to half of what it was before this government came to power. Thankfully, that figure is now rising dramatically.

Should you follow the example of hundreds of thousands of people who have already boycotted Zimbabwe in the belief that it will make a significant difference?

So yes, the country admittedly has a lot not to be proud of. As a direct result of all this, many potential tourists have decided to boycott this country, believing that by visiting Zimbabwe they would be helping the current regime not only financially but also by giving it a measure of legitimacy. Should you therefore follow the example of hundreds of thousands of people who have already boycotted Zimbabwe in the belief that it will make a significant difference?

Throughout the 15 years following the farm invasions of 2000 and onwards, I can’t find anything or anyone to point to any evidence that the tourism boycott has made one jot of difference. At least, no positive difference. This is simply because
the drop in tourist numbers hasn’t directly affected anyone in government and, perhaps surprisingly to many, government revenue has hardly suffered.

Children Nyanga Zimbabwe by Paul MurrayA boycott on Zimbabwe only has a negative impact on its citzens © Paul Murray 

The harsh reality is that in Zimbabwe’s case the boycott has only had a negative effect on ordinary citizens. Tourism used to provide employment for thousands of people and supported countless others who provided peripheral services, but many of these jobs were lost when travel agents deleted Zimbabwe from their brochures and tourists took avoiding action. People who used to rely on tourism became penniless and desperate and joined hordes of other unemployed, migrating – usually illegally – to nearby countries where most found abject misery and violence rather than the promise of a better future they were hoping for.

It is now 2016 and things are slowly changing for the better with a gradual, but consistent increase in visitors and these numbers are growing year on year. Tourism is also benefiting from the lack of governmental travel advisories or bans in recent years. As a result, some tourist properties are being upgraded while many others are adding more rooms. Better still, there’s an encouraging number of newly built accommodation coming on the market, all resulting in a much needed increase in employment.

For me, the most persuasive argument comes from all the many Zimbabweans I meet – ordinary citizens, black and white – all of whom, without exception, earnestly want tourists to return. 

Wildlife is also benefitting as the impoverished national parks organisation (Zimbabwe Parks and Wildlife Management Authority, or ZPWMA) relies heavily on the private camps and lodges to provide essential infrastructure support. Without this input from tourism, many waterholes go unpumped, roads deteriorate, antipoaching patrols virtually cease, and subsistence poaching goes unchecked.

I am of course aware of all the counter-arguments, many of which deserve serious consideration. Yes, the government does benefi t from visa fees, VAT and tourism taxes but these add up to a tiny percentage of your tourism spend. I have taken a strong pro-tourism stance after careful consideration of the pros and cons, but for me, the most persuasive argument comes from all the many Zimbabweans I meet – ordinary citizens, black and white – all of whom, without exception, earnestly want tourists to return. None of them can understand how staying away from their country can possibly help them. Neither can I. We’ve tried a boycott and that didn’t work so it’s time for a diff erent approach. In short you will do much more to help the country and its wonderful people by visiting it, rather than boycotting it.

Back to the top


Post Comments

olivier candiotti posted on 20/03/2017 11:09
Dear Paul
Just one word: congrats and you are far away one of the finest expert on our beloved Zimb.
All your articles and comments are well balanced and of high degree of analysis.
Bravo
Bien à vous
Olivier

Submit Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment. Click here to log in.